I want to quickly address one more thing before I specifically respond to free-grace theology. The position I advocate (against free-grace theology) is sometimes labeled “lordship salvation.” Because of some misunderstanding (and sometimes misrepresentation by free-grace advocates), I want to define what it is that I (along with the vast majority of biblical scholars and teachers) hold to.
First of all, let me state what Lordship salvation is not. It is not an attempt to mingle works with grace (as in Roman Catholicism) and somehow allow for good works to be the basis of salvation. Every Lordship advocate I know of affirms that salvation is obtained by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. Lordship salvation does not believe that a person is saved by good works at any point—whether at the beginning, middle, or end of salvation. We believe that salvation is by grace from start to finish.
So what do we believe?
In essence, Lordship salvation teaches that a person is saved by grace through faith in Christ, but that the grace that saves is a transforming grace (leading a person to walk in the way of holiness, Tit. 2:11-14), the faith that saves is a working faith (Js. 2:14-26), and the Christ that saves is Lord and Ruler of the one being saved (Acts 16:31; Rom. 10:9-10).
One of the best definitions of Lordship salvation I have ever heard is provided by Nathan Busenitz, John MacArthur’s personal assistant:
“The lordship position teaches that salvation occurs at the moment of conversion, and that conversion includes a change of heart such that those who were enemies of Christ now love Him.”
See the rest of his thoughts here.
This is the substance of Lordship salvation and, it seems clear, is the point of departure from free-grace theology (which I wrote about in my last post). Again, the differences between free-grace theology and Lordship salvation is not over how we are saved. Both sides agree that salvation is by grace through faith in Christ. The issue is over what being saved looks like. The issue is over the nature of salvation. Are those who believe transformed in such a way that they inevitably produce fruit and persevere in loving [read: practically obeying] Christ throughout their lives? To this question both sides give different answers—free grace theology says no; Lordship salvation says yes. In this is the point of departure.
Lucas, great to see you joining the blogger club! Yea, like many within this "free grace" tradition, there is a real lack of systematic cohesion. I mean, what in the world do they do with the New Covenant? Does it not entail a "circumcision of the heart"? To be "saved" while lacking any spiritual change of the heart resulting in joyful obedience basically empties the "New Covenant" of any meaning. Salvation is fundamentally about transforming our heart so that we love God and neighbor genuinely and diligently.
ReplyDeleteMy experience with Free-Grace Salvationists is that they subscribe to a version of fortune-cookie Christianity where they pick out a few key verses and ignore 90% of Jesus’ actual words. For this particular narrowing of focus, I urge all interested parties to begin their soteriology by laying aside all of the Epistles, all of the modern pastors and apologists, and focus on what Christ Himself said, in its entirety, without using one of Jesus’ sentences to discount another. If we truly start with that, then it is impossible to arrive at Free-Grace theology. It is impossible to claim that we have salvation in Christ without heeding ALL of His words.
ReplyDelete